Source: nbc.com
I have a favorite show, and anyone who knows me in person knows what it is. NBC’s Chicago Fire is a drama that follows the lives of the firemen and paramedics of fictional firehouse fifty-one in Chicago. Although the show is fictional, many of the stories and themes explored in the episodes are based on real stories. Having watched every episode of the show multiple times, I’ve seen many of the very real ethical dilemmas that the show decides to retell, and this week I’ve decided to examine one of them.
On the fourth episode of the first season, the firemen are
called to attend to a massive warehouse fire. They enter the warehouse and
fight through the flames to rescue several homeless people and carry them to
safety. The fire chief, who is in charge of the rescue operation, sees that the
fire is about to flare up, and orders the firemen to exit the warehouse
immediately. However, the last man to leave, Peter Mills, notices a body in the
far corner of the warehouse. He follows orders and escapes the warehouse
seconds before the fire flares and fills the whole building, but the
unconscious homeless man dies in the explosion.
This episode highlighted the difficult position that fire
chiefs are often put in: having to decide between saving more victims and putting
his men at extreme risk.
This is a great ethical dilemma to examine, because its
premised on the fact that fire fighters are already performing a noble deed by
trying to rescue people and put out fires. In this case, it is not good vs.
evil, but rather which decision yields the most positive result.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHey Katy - I can totally relate to this post! I don't watch Chicago fire, but I do watch shows like Grey's Anatomy and Scandal. The doctors on Grey's often have to choose between two terminal patients to give a life saving surgery or organ to, and they're always the most gut-wrenching episodes. On Scandal, I remember an episode when they had to choose between following the will of their client and saving a women from an abusive relationship. They're all important ethical dilemmas with like you said, a utilitarian perspective that is sometimes hard to choose. I think it's important that shows explore issues like these because of the broad audience they access. It can make their viewers think in what is usually a mind-numbing activity which is always beneficial - and can help people like you and me justify watching one more episode!
ReplyDelete